Subject	Re: any more down sides?
Posted by	Ballistic on August 15, 2003 at 7:29 AM
	This message has been viewed 39 times.
In Reply To	any more down sides? posted by d-termine on August 14, 2003 at 10:16 PM
Message	personally,i think the transmounted engine is a downside on an AWD car. i know im ugly,but im a really bad ugly
Follow Ups	NZR Anyone have lancer evo stats? - d-termine 21:51:17 08/14/03 Google found me this - SeedyROM 22:04:01 08/14/03 thnx, kind of lazy, and most of you guys have this - d-termine 22:12:06 08/14/03 i would rather have the new wrx because... - spyhunter 22:09:20 08/14/03 Yeah, more and more Evo people are complaining - SeedyROM 22:11:42 08/14/03 I thought it was ~16psi - U ZCREAM 22:16:34 08/14/03 Nope, 19psi. Here's baseline dyno/info from Vishnu - SeedyROM 22:25:54 08/14/03 Still seems like a ton of boost coming from stock fuel maps - U ZCREAM 22:29:18 08/14/03 any more down sides? - d-termine 22:16:58 08/14/03 Well...the Z may not be right for him though - SeedyROM 22:23:05 08/14/03 Right now he has a 93 civic i think - d-termine 22:27:17 08/14/03 2 engines and 4 turbos in 5 months max. (n/m) - bobthemunchie 22:30:33 08/14/03 Re: any more down sides? - Ballistic 07:29:35 08/15/03 also, the stock clutch blows on the Evo. - Spee 22:22:25 08/14/03 Both cars look worse than Jessica Tandy though (n/m) - therinL 01:03:14 08/15/03 Evo's are in the 11's with stock turbo (n/m) - Kevin (CA) 11:50:40 08/15/03 13.5 in the quarter, 278 hp if I recall correctly (n/m) - ZLover4Life 22:27:33 08/14/03 Really? Thought they were a bit quicker... (n/m) - SeedyROM 22:30:00 08/14/03 nah, a friend of a friend of mine has one... - ZLover4Life 22:40:27 08/14/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.